|
by Howard Zinn; November 6, 2004
(from ZNet | Vision & Strategy)
In this awful world where the efforts of caring people often
pale in comparison to what is done by those who have power,
how do I manage to stay involved and seemingly happy?
I am totally confident not that the world will get better,
but that we should not give up the game before all the cards
have been played. The metaphor is deliberate; life is a gamble.
Not to play is to foreclose any chance of winning. To play,
to act, is to create at least a possibility of changing the
world.
There is a tendency to think that what we see in the present
moment will continue. We forget how often we have been astonished
by the sudden crumbling of institutions, by extraordinary
changes in people's thoughts, by unexpected eruptions of rebellion
against tyrannies, by the quick collapse of systems of power
that seemed invincible.
What leaps out from the history of the past hundred years
is its utter unpredictability. A revolution to overthrow the
czar of Russia, in that most sluggish of semi-feudal empires,
not only startled the most advanced imperial powers but took
Lenin himself by surprise and sent him rushing by train to
Petrograd. Who would have predicted the bizarre shifts of
World War II--the Nazi-Soviet pact (those embarrassing photos
of von Ribbentrop and Molotov shaking hands), and the German
Army rolling through Russia, apparently invincible, causing
colossal casualties, being turned back at the gates of Leningrad,
on the western edge of Moscow, in the streets of Stalingrad,
followed by the defeat of the German army, with Hitler huddled
in his Berlin bunker, waiting to die?
And then the postwar world, taking a shape no one could have
drawn in advance: The Chinese Communist revolution, the tumultuous
and violent Cultural Revolution, and then another turnabout,
with post-Mao China renouncing its most fervently held ideas
and institutions, making overtures to the West, cuddling up
to capitalist enterprise, perplexing everyone.
No one foresaw the disintegration of the old Western empires
happening so quickly after the war, or the odd array of societies
that would be created in the newly independent nations, from
the benign village socialism of Nyerere's Tanzania to the
madness of Idi Amin's adjacent Uganda. Spain became an astonishment.
I recall a veteran of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade telling
me that he could not imagine Spanish Fascism being overthrown
without another bloody war. But after Franco was gone, a parliamentary
democracy came into being, open to Socialists, Communists,
anarchists, everyone.
The end of World War II left two superpowers with their respective
spheres of influence and control, vying for military and political
power. Yet they were unable to control events, even in those
parts of the world considered to be their respective spheres
of influence. The failure of the Soviet Union to have its
way in Afghanistan, its decision to withdraw after almost
a decade of ugly intervention, was the most striking evidence
that even the possession of thermonuclear weapons does not
guarantee domination over a determined population. The United
States has faced the same reality. It waged a full-scale war
in lndochina, conducting the most brutal bombardment of a
tiny peninsula in world history, and yet was forced to withdraw.
In the headlines every day we see other instances of the failure
of the presumably powerful over the presumably powerless,
as in Brazil, where a grassroots movement of workers and the
poor elected a new president pledged to fight destructive
corporate power.
Looking at this catalogue of huge surprises, it's clear that
the struggle for justice should never be abandoned because
of the apparent overwhelming power of those who have the guns
and the money and who seem invincible in their determination
to hold on to it. That apparent power has, again and again,
proved vulnerable to human qualities less measurable than
bombs and dollars: moral fervor, determination, unity, organization,
sacrifice, wit, ingenuity, courage, patience--whether by blacks
in Alabama and South Africa, peasants in El Salvador, Nicaragua
and Vietnam, or workers and intellectuals in Poland, Hungary
and the Soviet Union itself. No cold calculation of the balance
of power need deter people who are persuaded that their cause
is just.
I have tried hard to match my friends in their pessimism about
the world (is it just my friends?), but I keep encountering
people who, in spite of all the evidence of terrible things
happening everywhere, give me hope. Especially young people,
in whom the future rests. Wherever I go, I find such people.
And beyond the handful of activists there seem to be hundreds,
thousands, more who are open to unorthodox ideas. But they
tend not to know of one another's existence, and so, while
they persist, they do so with the desperate patience of Sisyphus
endlessly pushing that boulder up the mountain. I try to tell
each group that it is not alone, and that the very people
who are disheartened by the absence of a national movement
are themselves proof of the potential for such a movement.
Revolutionary change does not come as one cataclysmic moment
(beware of such moments!) but as an endless succession of
surprises, moving zigzag toward a more decent society. We
don't have to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate
in the process of change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions
of people, can transform the world. Even when we don't "win,"
there is fun and fulfillment in the fact that we have been
involved, with other good people, in something worthwhile.
We need hope.
An optimist isn't necessarily a blithe, slightly sappy whistler
in the dark of our time. To be hopeful in bad times is not
just foolishly romantic. It is based on the fact that human
history is a history not only of cruelty but also of compassion,
sacrifice, courage, kindness. What we choose to emphasize
in this complex history will determine our lives. If we see
only the worst, it destroys our capacity to do something.
If we remember those times and places--and there are so many--where
people have behaved magnificently, this gives us the energy
to act, and at least the possibility of sending this spinning
top of a world in a different direction. And if we do act,
in however small a way, we don't have to wait for some grand
utopian future. The future is an infinite succession of presents,
and to live now as we think human beings should live, in defiance
of all that is bad around us, is itself a marvelous victory.
|