|
A History of the Buddhist Peace Fellowship:
The Work of Engaged Buddhism
Chapter 3: Work
around the world
[Our] main strength is our ability
to act quickly and flexibly. We respond to what is right
in front of us, as our training in mindfulness teaches us
to do.
Work in the US
BPF is based in the United States, so we
have a strong network of activists and supporters here. There
are some 15 BPF-affiliated chapters, each doing Buddhist-inspired
activist work in their own communities. The BPF National Office
provides support and encouragement for BPF chapters, as well
as activists doing independent work here and abroad. Our new
volunteer BASE Program is flourishing, and we publish our
provocative, nonsectarian Turning Wheel quarterly magazine.
International Work
Our
international work has focused on Asia. Last year, with a
$5,000 grant from the Kaiser Foundation, we sponsored mobile
medical teams for displaced Burmese on both sides of the Thai/Burma
border; a second grant has just come through for this year.
Many BPF members worked for and rejoiced in Aung San Suu Kyi's
release from six years of house arrest, just the first step
towards democracy in Burma. Our Tibetan revolving loan program
has distributed $40,000 in low interest loans to right livelihood
projects in Tibetan exile communities in Nepal and India.
BPF's East Bay Chapter has a long-standing program that provides
thousand of meals to Tibetan children in the settlements.
We celebrated Sulak Sivaraksa's successful defense against
charges of lese majeste, defamation of the king and former
leaders of Thailand's military junta. Keeping in mind our
vow to save all sentient beings, not just Buddhists, board
members and friends attended the NGO Conference for Women,
and work with “women in Black” to promote peace
and reconciliation in what was once Yugoslovia.
BPF's domestic work (which, of course, includes
BASE) centers on issues of weapons control and non-violence.
We helped create the program of spiritual leaders and nuclear
survivors commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of Hiroshima
and Nagasaki presented last August at the Nevada Nuclear Test
Site. Local members were key organizers of a week-long East
Bay Peace Walk, from Richmond to Livermore, California, underscoring
the links between handgun violence in the neighborhoods and
nuclear arms on the geopolitical stage. Our summer 1995 Institute,
with Nelson Foster, David Grant, Fran Peavey, and Tova Green,
focused on ways of transforming violence. We are also working
for a ban on land mines, cheap weapons of mass destruction
produced in the U.S. and Europe and used in unimaginable numbers
throughout the world, something we have learned about through
the teachings of Maha Ghosananda and our friends in Cambodia.
As an ecumenical Buddhist organization, BPF is creating a
Buddhist Ethics Project to provide resources and offer training
in matters of ethics and misconduct for Buddhist centers and
for individuals facing these issues within their communities.
Resources include mediation, pastoral counseling, legal referral,
healing, and advice to sanghas about ethical guidelines and
procedures. In this work we are closely allied with Jan Chozen
Bays, Robert Aitken, Yvonne Rand and others in the Western
Buddhist Teachers' network.
This patchwork of programs has great strengths
and weaknesses. The main strength is our ability to act quickly
and flexibly. We respond to what is right in front of us,
as our training in mindfulness teaches us to do. Another strength
is that we are consistent. Over the years, we've tried to
keep our key issues in sight — nuclear disarmament,
democracy and human rights in Tibet, Burma, and elsewhere,
social and environmental awareness in our communities. To
them have been added matters of race and gender in society
and in our sanghas, ethics, and building engaged Buddhist
communities. We are careful about our commitments because
we intend to see them through. Our principle weakness is lack
of strategy. How do we chose the work we do? What approach
do we take? Are we about service or social transformation
— is there a clear distinction? Do all the pieces of
our program support each other; do they flow from a guiding
vision?
|